Under oldstyle, mangled echoed unknown text to simulate old behavior.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8f3289828
commit
df87c596fb
4 changed files with 31 additions and 7 deletions
22
misc.c
22
misc.c
|
@ -102,6 +102,28 @@ void tokenize(char* raw, struct command_t *cmd)
|
|||
// pack the substrings
|
||||
cmd->wd1 = token_to_packed(cmd->raw1);
|
||||
cmd->wd2 = token_to_packed(cmd->raw2);
|
||||
|
||||
/* (ESR) In oldstyle mode, simulate the uppercasing and truncating
|
||||
* effect on raw tokens of packing them into sixbit characters, 5
|
||||
* to a 32-bit word. This is something the FORTRAN version did
|
||||
* becuse archaic FORTRAN had no string types. Don Wood's
|
||||
* mechanical translation of 2.5 to C retained the packing and
|
||||
* thus this misfeature.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It's philosophically questionable whether this is the right
|
||||
* thing to do even in oldstyle mode. On one hand, the text
|
||||
* mangling was not authorial intent, but a result of limitations
|
||||
* in their tools. On the other, not simulating this misbehavior
|
||||
* goes against the goal of making oldstyle as accurate as
|
||||
* possible an emulation of the original UI.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (settings.oldstyle) {
|
||||
cmd->raw1[TOKLEN+TOKLEN] = cmd->raw1[TOKLEN+TOKLEN] = '\0';
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(cmd->raw1); i++)
|
||||
cmd->raw1[i] = toupper(cmd->raw1[i]);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(cmd->raw2); i++)
|
||||
cmd->raw2[i] = toupper(cmd->raw2[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hide the fact that wods are corrently packed longs */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue