standardebooks/charles-darwin_the-origin-of-species
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/standardebooks/charles-darwin_the-origin-of-species.git synced 2025-09-22 02:26:51 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fixed some build issues

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
David Grigg 2018-12-31 15:00:45 +11:00
parent 3ee6ca5e14
commit bed9c3797c
2 changed files with 15 additions and 9 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/epub/css/local.css
View file

@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ footer{
text-align: right;
}
i em{
font-style: normal;
}
section[epub|type~="halftitlepage"] span[epub|type~="subtitle"]{
display: block;
font-size: .75em;

2
src/epub/text/endnotes.xhtml
View file

@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
<body epub:type="backmatter z3998:non-fiction">
<section id="endnotes" epub:type="rearnotes">
<h2 epub:type="title">Endnotes</h2>
<ol>
<li id="note-1" epub:type="rearnote">
<p>Aristotle, in his <i epub:type="se:name.publication.book">Physicae Auscultationes</i> (lib.2, cap.8, s.2), after remarking that rain does not fall in order to make the corn grow, any more than it falls to spoil the farmer’s corn when threshed out of doors, applies the same argument to organisation; and adds (as translated by <abbr>Mr.</abbr> Clair Grece, who first pointed out the passage to me), “So what hinders the different parts (of the body) from having this merely accidental relation in nature? as the teeth, for example, grow by necessity, the front ones sharp, adapted for dividing, and the grinders flat, and serviceable for masticating the food; since they were not made for the sake of this, but it was the result of accident. And in like manner as to other parts in which there appears to exist an adaptation to an end. Wheresoever, therefore, all things together (that is all the parts of one whole) happened like as if they were made for the sake of something, these were preserved, having been appropriately constituted by an internal spontaneity; and whatsoever things were not thus constituted, perished and still perish.” We here see the principle of natural selection shadowed forth, but how little Aristotle fully comprehended the principle, is shown by his remarks on the formation of the teeth. <a href="../text/preamble.xhtml#noteref-1" epub:type="se:referrer">↩</a></p>
</li>
@ -17,6 +18,7 @@
<li id="note-3" epub:type="rearnote">
<p>From references in Bronn’s <i epub:type="se:name.publication.book">Untersuchungen uber die Entwickelungs-Gesetze</i>, it appears that the celebrated botanist and palaeontologist Unger published, in 1852, his belief that species undergo development and modification. Dalton, likewise, in Pander and Dalton’s work on Fossil Sloths, expressed, in 1821, a similar belief. Similar views have, as is well known, been maintained by Oken in his mystical <i epub:type="se:name.publication.book">Natur-Philosophie</i>. From other references in Godron’s work <i epub:type="se:name.publication.book">Sur l’Espece</i>, it seems that Bory <abbr class="name">St.</abbr> Vincent, Burdach, Poiret and Fries, have all admitted that new species are continually being produced. I may add, that of the thirty-four authors named in this Historical Sketch, who believe in the modification of species, or at least disbelieve in separate acts of creation, twenty-seven have written on special branches of natural history or geology. <a href="../text/preamble.xhtml#noteref-3" epub:type="se:referrer">↩</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</section>
</body>
</html>