diff --git a/documents/Powerof10Guide.md b/documents/Powerof10Guide.md
index ea66b22..9b56873 100644
--- a/documents/Powerof10Guide.md
+++ b/documents/Powerof10Guide.md
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 # NASA-style Programming for C#
 
-I asked the AI to write their [NASA-style](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_10:_Rules_for_Developing_Safety-Critical_Code) [coding instructions](Powerof10PPrompt.txt) in the form of guidelines. I figured I'd use C# since it's both my preferred language and the syntax should be fairly easy to grasp once you understand the basics.
-
-Why NASA? Their coding standards have loads of redundancies, and if AI is going to behave like advanced code generation tools, they need to be as fault-tolerant as possible. While my instructions were modified to account for modern languages, the principles are still the same.
+I asked the AI to write their [NASA-style](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_10:_Rules_for_Developing_Safety-Critical_Code) [coding instructions](Powerof10PPrompt.txt) in the form of guidelines. I figured I'd use C# since it's both my preferred language and the syntax should be fairly easy to grasp once you understand the basics. 
 
 My only request was to apply .NET 6's [top-level statements](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/tutorials/top-level-statements) for brevity. Aside from a few organizational tweaks with the guidelines and fixing the scope example to be wrapped in a class, it all works flawlessly.
 
+Why NASA? Their coding standards have loads of redundancies, and if AI is going to behave like advanced code generation tools, they need to be as fault-tolerant as possible. While my instructions were modified to account for modern languages, the principles are still the same.
+
 ## 1. Write Clear, Well-Structured, and Maintainable Code
 
 - Keep the code simple and coherent. Use meaningful identifiers and limit the complexity of expressions.